I hadn’t planned on testifying, but because of a Nurses Group, my National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) testimony was recorded into history on April 20th, 2022. NCI scheduled me for 1:55 pm. But the morning of, a witness withdrew (too many believed repercussions would be too much to bear for them or their family). Ten minutes before 9:00, they informed me I was up first. At the last second, Dr. Francis Christian sat in the chair.
Because of previous heart-felt and comprehensive testimonies, my testimony ended up being delayed to around 3:00 pm. My testimony did not go as I had hoped. Because of time constraints and how I was questioned, it caused my testimony to alter. After sharing my statement, I had hoped the Inquiry’s Lawyer and Commissionaires would ask more in-depth questions of my FOIPs.
Although I hit most of my key points, the following is what I had hoped to communicate.
I wish to thank the Inquiry for allowing me to testify.
Let me provide the Inquiry some background that led me to Freedom of Information requests.
After watching news videos concerning the Wuhan virus in January 2020, I held questions to the validity of it. Images of people dropping dead on street corners, or pumper trucks disinfecting streets and building fronts; or the construction of hospitals in seven days, yet they resembled pre-fabricated prison containers. Nothing comes out of China unless they released it for a reason. That reason definitely wasn’t for the benefit of Canada’s health and welfare.
In mid-March Premier Moe initiated the two weeks to flatten the curve mandates. We had yet to realize any depth to this so-called virus. Yet, the province issued measures with no hint of a pandemic.
I immediately questioned how one or two men, namely the Premier and the Chief Medical Officer could unilaterally stomp on our rights and freedoms without demonstrably proving why.
They deemed some of us non-essential and could not earn a living; nor could we freely travel. We were told we could not socialize with friends or even family; and we could not practice freedom of religion.
This Fascist response by the province caused me to resign my executive position for the Weyburn Big Muddy Saskparty Constituency Association. For approximately fifteen years, I held various rolls within, including CA president. My tenure as Provincial Director caused me to be on a first name basis within many MLAs and within government. Because I dared to question, I am now treated as a leper by these same individuals.
Shortly after resigning, I reached out to the Premier, the Minister of Health, and my MLA, Dustin Duncan. I asked approximately 45 questions regarding this Chinese manufactured virus. These were questions that every respectable news agency should have asked, but none did.
Over the summer, I sent them two more emails, similar to the first, and none responded to my questions.
Before the Province implemented masking mandates, my employer, at the time (Canada Post), implemented their own masking directives. I already studied enough research that I knew masking held no effect for stopping or limiting the spread of the virus, but in fact was detrimental to one’s health.
Personal experience confirmed masks were detrimental to my health. And I took exception to anyone telling me that wearing a mask was for my protection.
I have restricted sinuses and suffer from chronic sinusitis. Within minutes of wearing a protective mask (for example-working in dusty atmospheres), my sinuses immediately congest. Once I remove the mask, I need three hours for my sinuses to be fully clear. I know I suffered the effects of hypoxia because of wearing a mask.
Because of my sinuses and because of my personal liberties, I sought a mask exemption in September or October 2021.
Weyburn Health Center at the time was not allowing one-on-one visits with their doctors. Health Center Doctors were diagnosing patients over the phone. After asking for a mask exemption, Dr. Erfini informed me that and I quote: “Your personal health does not matter, it was the benefit of the public good”.
I sought an in-office visit 3 times. Each time, Erfini refused my request for a one-on-one appointment, and a mask exemption.
Needless to say, Erfini is no longer my doctor. I wrote a complaint to the Weyburn Health Center and to the SHA about Dr. Erfini. I received no response to my complaints.
I also emailed various departments within the SHA that mirrored my 45 questions sent to the provincial government. Just like our government, the SHA did not respond.
Because very few doctors were receiving new patients, it took a couple of months before I secured an in house visit with a reputable Regina doctor. The doctor told me that he could give me a mask exemption for valid medical reasons, but if he did, he could no longer practice medicine in Sask.
He confirmed the nature of Sask. health care.
Throughout this time, I remained committed to my personal COVID studies. Educating myself on the science, provincial legislation Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian Bill of Rights, and Canada’s criminal code.
It was clear from the altered legislation that the government protected themselves from litigation while they continued the attack on an individual’s rights and freedoms.
You have to ask why?
By late fall of 2021, I was reading about these mRNA drugs.
It was only after reading the Moderna drug patent, and realizing it held parasites, graphene hydroxide and quantum dots, that I better document some of my findings rather than committing it to memory. Those key findings rest in a spreadsheet.
December 2021, I began filing freedom of information requests. My intent was to gather evidence to prepare for legal action under the Canada’s Criminal Code 504 to 507, the laying of private information.
I wanted to hold those in authority accountable for our loss of freedoms, and the misinformation concerning covid coming from our governments, the SHA and from the media.
I set my sights on the SHA for this reason--
While requesting a blockage of my ehealth and Panorama records, I noticed some questionable entries within my Panorama records. My records indicated covid symptoms when I declared allergy symptoms. There were also a few other entries that I considered being fraudulent. (Sharing these events is a testimony in itself)
Needing to get my feet wet, I began with 2 requests to the Holy Family School board in December 2021 (HF-2021-02- G and HF-2021-03-G). I considered this a practice test. But, I also considered that schools’ and the Ministry of Education’s actions concerning Covid prevention to be child abuse and an infringement of rights to anyone attending, working or volunteering within a school.
Being prudent, I sent identical FOIP requests to the Ministry of Education (ED22-21G) and to the Ministry of Health (HE97-22G). Shortly afterwards, the number of FOIP requests took off.
After my third FOIP, Holy Family took exception to my FOIP requests. They solicited the Saskatchewan School board Association’s help to petition a disregard letter with the Privacy commissioner. (040-2022, 041-2022, 042-2022)
Holy Family RCSSD # 140 was the same separate school board I once sat on as a trustee. Sitting on this ‘Christian’ based school division, I helped draft their current mission and vision statements. Holy Family now accused me of vexatious statements and insinuated comments which I did not utter. Thankfully, I held proof to my counter arguments—I had someone witness my recorded conversation with Holy Family’s Director of Education.
During this time, I sent FOIP requests to the Premier’s office (ECFOI-671-21), the Ministry of Health (HE125-22), and to the Ministry of Education (ED04-22G). Each of these requests asked for records concerning a cost benefit analysis being conducted before implementing covid measures.
Within a week, the Premier’s office contacted me and asked for clarification. Our phone conversation lasted 45 minutes as I explained what records I wanted. At the end of our call, the Premier’s office agreed that she understood my request.
A couple of weeks later, the Premier’s office provided me an estimate. Their estimate was just under $389,000. After a careful review of the estimate, it was clear the Premier’s office was not searching for the records that I had requested.
I challenged the Premier’s quote. A few weeks later, the Premier’s office, like the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Health, returned a response that stated no records exist.
The obvious question was the quote a tactic to dissuade my search?
It was clear my FOIP requests were going to be a battle. Each month having to send reminder letters and having to request reviews with the Privacy Commissioner. Every aspect was challenging and time consuming. It was evident the government did not want to provide me with information.
I should note that each of my requests was developed on my personal time, and I bore the brunt of those costs. Meanwhile, government employees use taxpayers' time and dollars to deny our right of access.
During this time, Freedom groups began to converge and share information. Noting my FOIP success, I had individuals, … teachers, nurses, even a doctor who worked for the federal government reaching out to me for help with the process.
By mid-spring 2022, I won my battle with Holy Family. The Privacy commissioner agreed with my arguments. Holy Family provided the records at no cost.
DISREGARD DECISION 040-2022, 041-2022, 042-2022
After reading that material, it was clear, School Boards and schools were agents of the SHA in promoting fear and the misinformation (I was advised not to use fraud).
As I reviewed Holy Family’s material, I was also comparing the pharmaceutical clinical studies with the SHA’s website information. Inadvertently, I discovered a course link that allowed one to be approved to administer the COVID immunization.
BASE Learning for COVID-19 Immunization
The SHA public website claims that the Covid MRNA drugs are safe. Even for pregnant women.
The immunization course indicated different and confirmed a few more dangers, yet it was not as comprehensive as the drug company’s clinical studies and the number of severe adverse events occurring around the world.
This causes me to ask, who approved the SHA Website?
I should also mention, the Ministry of Education withheld much of the material I sought. At present, the Privacy commissioner is reviewing my request that the Ministry must provide all material. (ED22-21G Redacted Information)
Earlier in 2022, I sent a request to the SHA asking for records of adverse reactions from Covid drugs during 2021 (LAFOIP 2021-2022-081). Their final response, “The SHA is not refusing to provide this information, we are not the holders of this information.” They referred me to the MINISTRY OF HEALTH.
Mid to late June 2022, after a near 6-month battle with the Ministry of Health, I finally received the requested adverse events records for the year of 2021. HE123-22G. After a quick read, I knew this needed to be shared, because the 122-page report was damaging. I immediately provided it to Sask Alliance.org. Sask Alliance was preparing legal action to challenge those in authority (our provincial government and the SHA) on informed consent.
Sask Alliance has access to noted doctors, academia, virologists, nurses and lab technicians. A month later, HE123-22G’s review was shared with the media. What was notable, out of the 1200 plus individuals who had an adverse reaction, 7 Saskatchewan people died. And 300 had severe reactions and were told to get a second jab.
I should also note, I know many individuals from the Weyburn area who suffered an adverse event. I know of none to be listed within HE123-22G. Furthermore, it is estimated that less than 10% of the adverse events are being recorded.
The media release for HE123-22G came during the Carol Pearce tragedy. The adverse event records and the tragedy garnered international attention.
After Carol’s death, CKOM published an article that claimed, as per the Ministry of Health, no deaths had occurred in Saskatchewan from adverse reactions. I considered that a blatant lie.
My response was immediate. I emailed CKOM and provided my FOIP request and the records provided by the Ministry of Health. Sarah Mills responded with a brush off—“Thank you for the information. If you have autopsy results we would certainly welcome them. Sarah.”
CKOM altered their original article, but in my opinion, it did not accurately report the number of adverse events, nor did the article rebuke the Ministry of Health for releasing misinformation.
https://www.ckom.com/2022/09/21/saskatchewan-still-recording-no-deaths-related-to-covid-vaccine/
CKOM, like other Saskatchewan media, continue to protect government overreach, continue to perpetuate fear, and continue to spread misinformation. Why?
During this period, I awaited a response from the SHA, where I asked for records of accuracy concerning PCR testing (Access to Information Request 22-23-011);
I also sent a request concerning the chain of custody for my DNA taken by nasal swab for PCR testing. I wanted to know the chain of custody for a person’s DNA after PCR testing. Were they destroyed, or as my research indicated, some labs were selling DNAs to other laboratories.
Unfortunately, because of my busy agenda, I overlooked my chain of custody request.
Late in the fall of 2022, the SHA finally provided some of the requested records for my PCR FOIP. They redacted most of the records concerning my request/refused.
Regarding the PCR accuracy portion of my request, the SHA wrote the following convoluted statement:
Something have not provide the information you are requesting above as the SHA is not obligated to create a record in order to respond to an access to information request. As you are requesting information rather than records this portion of your request has been denied as a previous record was not created for a business purpose.
Pressing the SHA for clarification, they responded, no records exist.
The SHA declares PCR testing as the gold standard. Yet, there are no records proving that statement, or the validity of the PCR test.
I would like to quote Kary Mullis the inventor of the PCR test and the man who called Fauci a fraud –
Kary Mullis: "It's just a process used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That's what it is. It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that."
To put Mullis’s comment into context, detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact and infectious. The isolation of infectious virus from positive individuals requires virus culture methods.
My FOIP to the SHA held many parts. SHA refused to release some of those records. In order for the SHA to provide the refused records, I’m preparing an OIPC request to review.
Part of my review arguments are contingent upon the Ministry of Education review (ED 22-21G/IPC 217-2022). As arguments are similar to both cases.
I MUST NOTE, Since January 2020, I have read 100s of thousands of pages of official documents.
I’ve personally sent 26 FOIP requests. I do not track those who asked for help.
Concerning my filings with the Privacy commissioner.
- I have won 3 decisions
- 2 filings are currently under review. I will send 2 more within a week.
- There are 2 more review requests in early draft.
My questions continue. And so will be my freedom of information requests.
Thank you. That concludes my testimony.