Thanks to word of mouth, and individuals like Shaun Newman and his podcast (https://shaunnewmanpodcast.com/) I’ve been fielding more questions concerning Freedom of Information requests. To help and motivate others, I believe it beneficial to write something for The Naked Blog.

As with all things concerning life, there must be a birth and a life. Early 2021, the hand of God introduced me to a local freedom group who focused on educating the masses. By October, their trust allowed me to become a core member. To these two women, I give my gratitude and love.

In the fall of 2021, our small but mighty freedom group organized ourselves and developed a plan. We were fighting back. We kicked off our battle with Notice of Liabilities.

Our goal, intimidate politicians and public trustees to return our rights. If memory serves me correctly, our small group sent out 3000 NOLS within 6 weeks.

Being heavily involved in provincial politics and having a limited run in federal, I understood politics. I knew the NOLs would be ignored. We needed a backup plan. A couple of us within the group studied Canada’s criminal code. Our fight would continue within the courts.

Knowing that the legal system would be against us, we planned to use Section 504, 505 of the Criminal Code of Canada, to file charges. That section allows private information to be filed with the Justice of Peace and bypass a bit of the corrupt justice system.

CC 504 reads: Anyone who, on reasonable grounds, believes that a person has committed an indictable offence may lay an information in writing and under oath before a justice, and the justice shall receive the information, where it is alleged

This section describes the process by which any person may lay an information before a justice that another person has committed an indictable offence.

The information must be in writing and under oath. The justice must receive the information if it contains any of the allegations set out in paras. (a) to (d).

One requires solid evidence when battling within the courts. Thus began our research for the use of freedom of information. Go where the evidence leads.

Needing to understand the process, we set our sights locally and challenge the system with a few lesser battles. As our knowledge grew, we would use our experience to go after larger fish or, more precisely, go after the parasites assisting the sharks.

My first Freedom of Information and Privacy (FOI or FOIP) request I directed to one of our local school boards, Holy Family RCSSD #140. Handing them two FOIPS on December 20, 2021.

Before the day was done, I mirrored my request to the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Education.

Sitting still is not one of my virtues. I also undertook a subsequent front. Earlier in December 2021, I blocked access to my ehealth and Panorama records from public health.

I’ll admit, Ehealth responded to my blockage requests. But working with Public Health and blocking Panorama records was a cluster fuck. I discovered Public Health had no idea what they were doing. They were creating policy on the fly and during an audit of my Panorama records; I found what I believed to be fraudulent entries. Thus, my sights set on the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) for court action.

These next few paragraphs may seem irrelevant concerning FOIPs, but they provide credibility to research and asking questions. It will also enlighten you to the depths of corruption or the stupidity running rampant within our institutions.

Back to my allegation. In March 2021, during my weekend off, I received a call from the SHA—a co-worker tested positive for COVID. Not fully understanding the process and their game, I was coerced into PCR testing. I held no COVID symptoms, only seasonal allergies, which I’ve always suffered through during that time of year. Public health recorded my allergies as Covid symptoms. My results from Roy Romanow lab claimed I tested positive for the variant.

Did I have COVID or the variant?

Most people remain unaware that during PCR testing, you are submitting a sample of your DNA.

NOTE: I had not yet discovered the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act—formerly Bill S-201: An Act to prohibit and prevent genetic discrimination. Nor was I aware of the DNA Identification Act.

As I discovered more of the PCR test, the question of INFORMED CONSENT came into play. My understanding of both DNA acts and our Canadian Bill of Rights causes me to believe that the PCR test is illegal. Because, they are testing your DNA.

This information, and answers to subsequent questions that immediately come to mind, were not shared with me or with anyone else before submitting to testing.

• WHAT ARE THEY DOING WITH THAT DNA? Some jurisdictions sell it for further study.
• OR, are they recording your DNA in a national data base to be used for tracking when digital ID comes into play?

Now, since day one of this Fascist nonsense, I questioned the validity of PCR testing and their gold standard statement. It’s been a tedious process, discerning fact from fiction.

I’ve asked doctors, politicians, and SHA officials; none would provide me the accuracy of PCR testing. Those who answered simply repeated the red herring buzz phrase—it was the gold standard. This is the same tactic, and colorful language advertising firms use to entice consumers to use questionable products.

During my research concerning PCR testing, some articles claim this gold standard to be only a 10% accurate. It depends upon the cycle threshold or CT being used.

The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis publicly stated—the PCR test was being misused. It was not a test. It finds what you are looking for. Mullis also claimed Fauci was a fraud.

This past June, after 5 months of fighting the SHA and public health, the time was right to gather evidence. That meant a LAFOIP to the SHA that verified the accuracy of the PCR test.

The SHA promised to have the information at the end of August. Then it was the end of October. Now they are promising the end of November. On November 29, 2022, I received 9 emails with attachments.

Skimming through the information, most of it is fluff. The intent of my FOIP was ignored. What is the accuracy of PCR tests?

Jumping back to late January 2022. I submitted cost benefit analysis FOIPs with the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health and the Premier’s office.

A few days later, a politician’s aid from the premier’s office contacted me seeking clarification of the records I sought. For 45 minutes, I explained what a cost/benefit analysis was, and the information I wanted. At the end of that call, the woman claimed she understood my request.

A few weeks later, I received an estimate from the Premier’s office. The estimate — $388,812.84.

Scrutinizing the estimate, it was clear, not one word entailed a cost benefit analysis.

I challenged their estimate. It resulted in, “no records exist”. That same response came from the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Education.

Meanwhile, Holy Family colluded with the Saskatchewan School Boards Association to petition the privacy commissioner to have my four FOIP requests with school board, disregarded.

Politics is politics. But what was disconcerting, Holy Family insinuated, and implied in their argument to the privacy commissioner, that I made vexatious statements. A Catholic institution purposely defamed my character. I once sat as a trustee and helped author their current mission and vision statement.

Besides having a friend silently witness my phone call with Holy Family, I recorded our conversations. With this backing in hand, I challenged the disregard and proved Holy Family’s statements false. Holy Family failed to prove their arguments. I WON!

Tune in next month, as I share must know information and further successes—HE123-22G was huge!